History of Pueblo Revolt Essay Example for Free

History of Pueblo Revolt Essay â€Å"Every piece of written history starts when somebody becomes curious and asks questions.†[1] In Weber’s compilation he gathers several of these curious peoples works and binds their writings together to form a sort of continued discussion. Arguing from different sources and coming from different backgrounds, they indubitably arrive at different conclusions. From Garner to Gutià ©rrez and from Chà ¡vez to Knaut, they all are part of a continued dialogue on what that caused the Pueblo Revolt of 1680. By addressing the readings as a sum instead of individual accounts, one can gain a more detailed view. While some poke holes in others theories, most of the time, the writers simply offer different perspectives. The vast range of the arguments speak to the difficulty of the topic. Examining an event (or series of events, as the case may be) 300 years ago is an arduous task, but trying to determine causation of such events is even more cumbersome. Typically numerous factors exist and to give these factors any sort of rankings requires a fair bit of perspiration on the part of the researcher. This essay will attempt to evaluate this eclectic mix of commentaries to sift out the strong arguments from the weak. In 1598, when Juan de Oà ±ate arrived in northern New Mexico with a small group of colonists to Pueblo country, Spain demanded payment of tribute and the friars demanded allegiance of religion. For over 80 years Spanish lived with Pueblo before the revolt multiple generations.[2] As Knaut points out, that as â€Å"colonists were isolated from the south in a land where indigenous inhabitants numbered in the tens of thousands†, meaning there was plenty of contact between the two groups.[3] Within that time families intermarried, and a large mestizo population arose, creating an intersection in the Venn diagram of early New Mexico. What Knaut argues in Acculturation and Miscegenation is not necessarily as hard as the others to prove who or what caused the revolt, but rather works in earnest to present what he sees as the creation of a mixed culture, with syncretism occurring on both sides. Perhaps in this essay more questions that answers are created why after 82 years of livin g together would the Pueblos revolt? Garner has a more direct answer to this question. He, unlike Knaut, does not spend as much time underlining the syncretism that occurs, but spends more time examining the relationship between Pueblo and Franciscan, and reigning in the perhaps unfair harshness of previous works in relation to the government. Garner believed that drought, famine and Apache raids caused the revolt, shedding the competing notions that religious incompatibility or having a suitable leader as primary causes.[4] The two arguments in the proceeding articles before Garner that religion was the primary cause fall flat from Garner’s lens. In one instance, he cites the friction between Father Isidro Ordonez and Governor Pedro de Peralta as a result of the governments unfair treatment of the Indian. Peralta eventually decides to have Ordonez arrested, but the colonists (or ecomenderos) proceed to abandon the governor.[5] Garner goes on that governors of early New Mexico are interpreted in a negative light primarily because â€Å"documents are strongly biased against them.†[6] He explains that the reason that these documents are so biased is because of the natural tension between the writers of these records, the Franciscans, and those whom they wrote about, the governors.[7] Garner continues to impress that the Franciscans were the friend to the Indian and foe to the governor. He cites Scholes who states, â€Å"the religious and economic motives of empire were antagonistic if not essentially incompatible.† Having earlier established a different relationship structure than what was typically seen, (a shift from the Hispanic-Pueblo dichotomy to a more complex relationship of priest-Indian-mestizo-colonist-governor) Garner then moves on to the crux of the issue the cause of the revolt. â€Å"The kind of peace that had been pervading New Mexico was contingent upon relative prosperity,† writes Garner. The Spanish had used their organizational skills to create surpluses in the Pueblo economy but the famine of 1670 was so implacable it essentially collapsed the system. The drought of the 1660s the precursor to the famine was so severe it caused â€Å"Indians and Spanish alike to eat hides and straps,† as written by Fray Francisco de Ayeta in an account to the King. In the face of such an oppressive environment, Indians naturally began to question why Spanish controlled their food source. This, coupled with a new emphasis on nativism, turned up the heat and brought the already tense situation to a simmer. This movement towards nativism perhaps may have been a reaction to Indian culture sprouting up in both mestizo and Spanish life. Garner continues on this thread noting that Governor Lopez de Mendizabal was forced to â€Å"crack down on Pueblo religious and cultural activity.† While syncretism among the Pueblos was tolerable, among the Spanish it was viewed as inexcusable. These two factors were the foci of the Pueblo Revolt of 1680.[8] In contrast, the setting that Bowden and Gutià ©rrez attempt to construct in their essays is a religious clash, one that, while not noticeable immediately, was exacerbated by the droughts and famine. After introducing the essay, Bowden then discusses the similarities of the Pueblo religion, and then highlights some of the missteps the Franciscans took in their interactions and, most of all, the conversion process. First they insisted that the Pueblos should learn Spanish, and â€Å"almost without exception,† failed to make any attempt to learn native language. Also, they instituted mandatory mass attendance for all Indians but strangely not all Spaniards. On top of this, leaders who continued practicing the previous traditions were whipped or executed.[9] (27-28) Bowden raises a number of valid points the Franciscans do not appear to be the same persons that protested against the injustices to the Pueblos by the Governor Peralta. Rather, they seem to be creators of an oppressive environment that was quite insensitive to the Pueblo people. However, if you note Bowden’s sources, he cites textbooks for his long diatribe. Garner, in contrast, relies heavier on topic specific articles written by respected names such as France V. Scholes and Jack D. Forbes. While Bowden’s sources are legitimate, he seems to be using information that is more generalized, and not as focused on the relevant issues. Gutià ©rrez points to â€Å"loss of authority† among the Franciscans as the central reason for the revolt.[10] He notes that this gradual loss of power began in 1640s. Because of the uncertainty and unease that followed, the Friars pushed for more drastic measure to balance out this loss of power a crackdown on syncretism and an emphasis on martyrdom. But the connections that Gutià ©rrez makes are weak; he points to the loss of power in the 1640s, but does not cite any kind of example to support his point until 1655.[11] In addition, most of examples of this â€Å"loss of authority† do not come until the mid 1660s and the early 1670s in the midst of drought, quarreling among Spaniards and attacks by Athapascan raiders. And Gutià ©rrez’ examples of Franciscan brutality arise, interestingly enough, around the time that Garner points to heavy handed response by the Spanish to combat syncretism. Gutià ©rrez’ illustrations seem to support Garner’s idea of the Indians being â€Å"like children in a new world and entrapped in the struggle between the Franciscans and Hispanic community.†[12] Angà ©lico Chà ¡vez provides yet another take on the Pueblo Revolt. While Gutià ©rrez, Garner and Bowden all spend considerable time on relations, Chà ¡vez as his title Pohà ©-yemo’s Representative and the Pueblo Revolt of 1680 puts much more emphasis on establishing a new leader as a primary cause of the Pueblo revolt. Chà ¡vez seems to avoid tackling the revolt squarely (like Knaut) partly because he devotes most of his time supporting his argument for Domingo Naranjo as the leader (arguably 21 of the 24 pages). Despite Chà ¡vez lengthy narrative supporting Domingo Naranjo, the black leader with yellow eyes, many scholars reject this notion, because it seems to runs counter to what most sources suggest. Historian Stefanie Beninato agrees that Naranjo was a leader, but â€Å"one of several† as â€Å"the concept of a single leader is not viable in the theocratic social structure of the Pueblo world.†[13] Garner too, while recognizing Popà © as instrumental, rejects the idea that he was a â€Å"unique Indian leader,† but rather he arose out of necessity, as opposed to the creation of necessity.[14] While, many critique Chà ¡vez’ uncommon interpretation, it reminds one to reexamine the mestizo and mulatto population in New Mexico. Naranjo, real or not, represents the truth that the black/white Pueblo/Hispanic definition was increasingly blurred in the years leading up to the revolt, and an entirely different culture had emerged. Pohà ©-yemo had multiple windows in to this culture of multiplicity. Garner’s essay seems to be built around the most logic because his essay points to lack of basic necessities as the true cause of the revolt. When there is enough food and prosperity people get along. When there is a shortage, it pushes groups to exceptional measures. Rarely has a revolt occurred without certain factors mitigating access to peoples’ basic needs. Garner also spends ample time with the battle itself, and provides plenty of evidence of to why it was a success; particularly because of the cultural coexistence with the Spanish. Garner is not without flaw he fails to address certain issues, notably that of the presence of a larger mestizo culture. While he acknowledges it somewhat, he seems more preoccupied with the Franciscan-ecomedero versus government dynamic. This oversight, however excusable, provides good reason for holding onto multiple sources while dissecting historical events such as these. In the absence of primary documents, the importance of rigorous scholarship is especially crucial. To hold the works of these â€Å"curious† scholars together stresses the value for careful thought and due diligence.

Comparing Trains and Planes as Means of Transportation Essay examples -

Comparing Trains and Planes as Means of Transportation From the dawn of time, man has followed his urge to travel; sometimes neglecting the enjoyment of the journey in pursuit of the destination. Although two of the favorable means of passenger transportation - the plane and the train - accomplish the task of arriving at a destination, there are distinct differences in their capacity for comfort, time, scenic value, and safety. To entice the weary traveler, accustomed and outraged by the rough, tiresome, and jolting rides on planes and trains, improvements have been made over the decades to pamper the passenger. Mechanical changes and physical changes enhance the traveling experience. Although airplane seats are space-efficient to the point of restricting movement, they are similar to the living room easy chair, reclining and cushy. At the push of a button, pillows and blankets are available. To distract, rather than to nourish, miniature bottles of liquor are served with plastic glasses. In comparison, traveling by train is similar to a luxurious hotel, in motion, with its ...

Bakhtin’s Theory of Self Knowledge

Mikhail Bakhtin in his theory of Self-Knowledge was primarily concerned with the freedom that a â€Å"fictional† character could have and its connection to the author. Accordingly, Bakhtin have suggested, what he calls, the theory of â€Å"surplus-vision† which corresponds to the inability of the character to obtain a self-knowledge which is only possible through having the chance to observe him self.In a more simple terms, Bakhtin explained that the character could or any other human being for that instance that exist outside of a person’s mind could not contemplate and think about the same things that the person who is contemplating has been thinking. Thus, when a person is contemplating about someone else, he would â€Å"see and know somethingâ€Å"that the character that the person has been contemplating could never see and know†.In such case that someone whom the person is contemplating, or that character that the person have been thinking could not act independently on his own without author, as its creator could have thought. Put plainly, this means that the character could never be in a situation wherein he can decide and write about himself without the authors will or foreknowledge. Bakhtin have further discussed that the character’s ability to act liberally would depend upon his being able to act in surprising manner. Such that, a free action is an action that no one else have thought of or have predicted.However, in the case of the character in its relation to its author, it seems to be very impossible for it to be able to act freely from the author’s wishes. This is where Bakhtin’s theory of self-knowledge plays an important role. It is when the analogy of the author and God that Human self-knowledge was put into question. Yet, according to Joseph Bartlett, even without the analogy to God, any person’s action is still predictable or can still be predicted by other person for instance, by someo ne who has known the other person for quite a long time.Thus the only way, in a view that divine intervention is not counted, that the person could be free is through knowing the expectation of other people and acting surprisingly (2005). Bakhtin believes that this was the only way that the person could act freely and not determined, having a self-knowledge of thy self is the only way to free thyself. For instance one of my friends has been living a very active lifestyle. He joins different sports and was engaged in interdisciplinary activities and courses.This is when he was to choose a humanities course for his senior year; I along with some of our friends have been really surprise when he took up an art course. It was really surprising and even more, when I asked him about his decision, he simply stated that he wants to surprise himself. References Bartlett, J. (2005). Freedom And Self-Knowledge In The Dramatic Works Of Anton Chekhov. University of Missouri-Columbia.

Key ethical theories - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 35 Words: 10507 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Religion Essay Type Descriptive essay Did you like this example? INTRODUCTION Before I begin, let me first suggest to you the overall task of Christian Ethics. If I speak about ethics, I speak about Who we are, how we are to perceive our world and how we are to live in this world. This is the main crux of Christian Ethics. In this assignment I would like to demonstrate a working knowledge of African, Western and African Christian Ethics. I will also look at the differences between selected ethical theories. ASSIGNMENT 1 Explain Western Ethics and evaluate the effect it has on our understanding of ethics. Underscore both the positives and negatives it has brought about in ethical thinking. According to Barnhill (2009) the Western tradition has four major approaches to ethics: The first two listed (Utilitarian Ethics and Deontological Ethics) are modern developments and they dominate modern philosophy. He says that Virtue ethics is as old as Plato and is making a bit of a come-back. Natural law ethics is relatively popular among environmental ethicists. After reading his Environmental studies, I have come to realise the following: This study speaks about goodness and badness. We can identify happiness with the good and sees virtue as a major part of happiness. We can explain that happiness and virtue should be detached. If we look at virtue it relates to good will, a good will is good in every circumstance and is absolute or unconditional good. It grows when you act for the sake of duty. A human action is morally good and is done for the sake of duty. Western Ethics shows us that an action can be motivated by duty and has moral worth. Not because of the resul ts it achieved, but for satisfying a formal principle. The principle of performing ones duty, whatever it may be. People have impulses and desires and that is why the moral law appears to us as a law that we must obey. This impulses and desires is our only source for moral judgement. This is our free will. Our free will can create a moral law and we will obey it. The human mind is able to know what is good and evil. To have value judgement is born from inside of us. This is called your conscience. Most people recognize that man is free to make his or her moral decisions. On the other hand, all the things that we do wrong come from our human desires. Men and women should follow the will of God. Use the will of God to make certain decisions in life. There is a universal moral law, the knowledge to free ourselves from human desires. We are free to make good and sound moral judgements. In the approach of care and the community, too much Western Ethics has given individuals the right to think about themselves. We must build love and compassionate relationships among people. The full theory of ethics would have to accommodate all four aspects of Western ethics. One way to sometimes approach Western ethics and the influence it has on ethics is based on four aspects like rights, goods, virtues and our relationship with each other. We must look at the following questions like: Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Key ethical theories" essay for you Create order Do our actions violate another persons rights? We must try to achieve good in life. Look at our integrity. Care for each other. Ethics and even Western Ethics can never be static and with Western Ethics there are certain frameworks and principles. We dont know whether Western Ethic has a future, but it really and most definitely do have a past. We can see that the patterns of the Western moral personality will continue to surface and really have to be dealt with, either through painful reflection or painful restructuring (Kunhiyop, 2004:29). Define in your own words Contemporary African Ethics. Highlight its important characteristics. Kigongo (nd) says that Contemporary African Ethics is a combination of African ethical tradition and European ethical tradition. What better way to describe Contemporary African Ethics than the word Ubuntu. Ubuntu means that people are people because of other people. In Africa nobody can survive alone, we need each other to survive. I think that we are all searching and suggesting new directions which to follow in pursuit of African values. We can say that the foundation of African ethics is definitely a humanistic worldview. Everything about the community is seen to exist not just in the here and now, but also in the past, through those who have already gone and also in the future, those who have yet to come. It is the past that influence the present and the present the future. Why, we ask, has this worldview, with the emphasis on respect for all mankind, support and responsibility not travel through the whole world yet? You remember in the second paragraph I spoke about Ubu ntu. Well, I can say that this worldview is expressed by the very society that lives according to it. If the community follows Contemporary African Ethics, they are living testimonies to their worldview. This worldview is worth reviving and respect for another, especially a stranger, is well known to communities in the south of the Sahara. With them a visitor was to be welcomed and feted, not suspected and resisted like in some of our communities (Kunhiyop, 2004:23-27). Africa is currently looking at a new future when it comes to African Ethics. Africa believes that its own worldview has so much potential and contemporary messages to give. Africa does not have all the above on record, but the culture itself speaks of enrichment and value. Definitely African values can be included in everything in life, for example in institutions of higher learning. The world needs more Contemporary African Ethics (Kunhiyop, 2004:13). Identify the key aspects of African Christian Ethics. I hear what Okolo (nd) says: First, the African may well count himself fortunate to be blessed with such a basically sound and enduring religious and moral tradition. But this does not at all mean that the Christian religion based on Christs love ethic constitutes a mere superficial dimension in his moral life. The Christian religion means for the African fundamental changes in many of his cultural values and options such that a real conversion is required for him to be a Christian in the authentic meaning of the term and in its ethical implication. I think that the African society is in a moral crisis. The African are having an identity crisis and have shifted away from their value system. Their moral values they gave away for other value systems. In a sense the first aspects is the fact that they have betrayed the African value system by analyzing it with the socio-economic and political implications that are taken from all the different value systems. The second aspect for me is the fact that Africans are now abandoning their value system by trying to embrace other systems, namely liberalism and utilitarianism. The consequence of this above mentioned shift is that the African will no longer be known by what he is, but by what he has acquired by different means. The African have lost the sense of Who am I and this created the moral crisis in South Africa. If we look at virtue ethics, I think it could help us to redeem the African value system as well as every individual in South Africa. Virtue ethics is intended to provide a society in which people can live a meaningful life. There is a general agreement amongst the African people that the African cannot be defined except in the closeness of the community. We can see the closeness of relationship between the individual and the social nature of the African. The African system is not concerned with material issues; it is concerned primarily with human beings in their relationship with one another. It is like that, the community means that the community alone can constitute the context, their social and cultural space. Africans needs to find freedom and responsibility in themselves and also in other people in South Africa. CONCLUSION Whether African Christian Ethics will start a different socio-economic and political arrangement remains a question that needs to be explored in-depth. Bibliography Barnhill D L 2007. Four Traditional Western Approaches to Ethics. Online article: https://www.uwosh.edu/faculty_staff/barnhill/ES_375/ethics.html, 07/01/2009. Kunhiyop S W 2004. African Christian Ethics. United States of America: Hippo Books. Kigongo J K n.d. The Relevance of African Ethics To Contemporary African Society. Online article: https://www.crvp.org/book/Series02/II-8/chapter_ii.htm, 13/01/2009. Okolo C B n.d. The African Experience of Christian Values: Dimensions of The Problematic. Online article: https://www.crvp.org/book/Series02/II-3/chapter_xi.htm, 13/01/2009. INTRODUCTION The Bible is an expression of Gods will to us and possesses the right supremely to define what we are to believe and how we are to conduct ourselves. In the book African Christian Ethics Samuel W. Kunhiyop gives us guidelines in biblical Christianity for Africa. Although Samuel Kunhiyops book does not deal exclusively with the role of the Bible, I will review his book to get to the core. We know that everything stays the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. To review a great Theologian like Samuel W. Kunhiyop, I dont think it is for me to comment on the way he wrote his book. ASSIGNMENT 2 Write a critical book review of the course textbook: Samuel Kunhiyop (2004), African Christian Ethics. In the introduction Samuel describes the need for writing this book: Christian ethics is often regarded the same as Western ethics, but they are really not the same. The two have become confused because Western missionaries did not bring a true and honest gospel but one that is different from the true gospel. Students who should be studying African Christian ethics are too often busy with the wrong ethical theories coming from the West. What should be taught in African theological colleges is an ethics that is African, biblical and Christian. That is what this book seeks to give to its reader (Kunhiyop, 2004:8-10). We can find a lot of information on African Christian Ethics through the internet and there is a lot of information for Western churches to use. Hippo books are so popular that they are used by many publishers and are well known throughout the world. Some of the publishers like Zondervan and African publishing houses also make use of Hippo books. Hippo books create an environment for the learner or student to get acquainted with all sections of Theology. Hippo books have got information and theories of many of scholars who share their knowledge and experience with us. Hippo books have got a vision to help with the growth in all African churches so they can see their culture from an evangelical perspective. Hippo books also published African Christian Ethics which I am about to review (Davy, 2010). Samuel Waje Kunhiyop was previously the Professor of Theology and Ethics at ECWA Theological Seminary. He holds a Bachelor of Theology, Masters of Theology and PhD at Trinity International University, Illinois. Samuel Waje Kunhiyop was ordained by the Evangelical Church of West Africa as a minister. Currently he is one of the heads of the Postgraduate School at the South African Theological Seminary (Kunhiyop, 2004:4-5). The need for an interpretation of Christianity and all its aspects from an African point of view was necessary. One such asp ect is the question of Christian ethics and how it is affected by Africa and its enormous cultural variety. Samuel identified the need to explore and explain the many questions that arose around the issue of African Christian ethics. According to Kunhiyop he started in his life seeking to find all information and truths about African Christianity. He studies for 8 years in Nigeria for his undergraduate theological training and another 7 years in the United States for his graduate theological training. In 1993 he went back to Nigeria and has been teaching now there for 11 years. Samuel is a great teacher of the Bible, Theology, Ethics and Philosophy. In 1994 he was teaching to a group of students and after finishing with them he asked the students What did you learn from this course? One of the students stood up and answered with the words nothing. Samuel was stunned and because of that answer, he started to investigate and wanted to seek for the right answers. He realised that the i nformation he gave through to the students did not pertain to them and their culture. He knew that he needed to do more for the students for them to succeed in life (Kunhiyop, 2004:8-9). If I can mention that it was very difficult to find the book in the library and Protea Bookshop gave an indication that it would take 10 weeks if I order the book. The book had to come from Kenya. When we look at the life of Samuel Waje Kunhiyop, we can see a Christian who believes in Jesus Christ as his personal Saviour. Although he did most of his studies overseas, he was born and raised in Africa. He wanted to help and assist African Christians struggling with their own situations and problems. He recognized that Africans, and even more so, African Christians, needed guidance in relation to the interpretation of their everyday personal problems within an ethical frame of reference (Kunhiyop, 2004:9). At first I didnt know what to make of the book African Christian Ethics. The book seemed extremely difficult to read, interpret and understand. Why might that be, I asked myself. Then I came to a conclusion. It was because I knew nothing about the Africans and their unique, intricate and diverse cultures. The only knowledge I have is about my own culture and roots. In Ethical Foundation: Section one Samuel Waje Kunhiyop explains what African morality and the African culture consists of (Kunhiyop, 2004:11). It is wonderful to read about my fellow African inhabitants within their interesting context. The songs they love to sing and the stories they love to tell. Then suddenly, the way of the African opens up to you and you begin to understand everything. The style in which the book has been written became much easier to read and interpret. As soon as I caught the drift of things, I enjoyed reading the book immensely. Samuel Waje Kunhiyop has done a lot of research to get to the truth. He also incorporated Biblical content to support his findings and to better explain the interpretation of these findings from a Christian point of view. At work my responsibilities include informing the soldiers about HIV and AIDS. With the knowledge that I gained from Samuels book I can now understand the African soldier better. It also helped me in building better relationships with the soldiers, as I better comprehend their training of thought and understanding of Christianity. Samuel Waje Kunhiyop, through this book, opened up the eyes of many people, scholars and foreigners, although I think there is many more to explore and more information to gain. In South Africa a lot of African people are still confused and do not have identity. I can see that when I work with the youth in South Africa. The youth are lacking the strong morals and values they need to become better human beings in their communities and societies. The content of this book is magnificent and I would definitely encourage other individuals to read it and apply it to future situations with the A frican cultures. Let us explore the content of the book in detail to grasp the crux of what Samuel Waje Kunhiyop want to explain to us. I believe Kunhiyops work is excellent and I want to give him all the credit for this book. The book is divided into two sections, section one: Ethical Foundations, Chapter one, two and three deals with the theory of ethics, while section two: Contemporary Ethical Issues, Chapter four to thirteen discusses practical issues. Issues that is so relevant that we can apply it in our daily lives. The issues are grouped in the following order, as given in the Table of content: Political Issues, Religious Issues, Medical Issues, Welfare Issues, Financial Issues, Witchcraft Issues, AIDS Issues, Marriage Issues, Sexual Issues and Reproductive Technologies. Each chapter begins with a general introduction followed by the chapters dealing with the specific issues in that area. Samuel does not go into a detailed debate regarding War, rather, he looks at the wars and conflicts in Africa and then examines the Bible to find an answer (Kunhiyop, 2004:2). Starting with Contemporary African ethics, we can see that the African society does believe in God as the highest order and as the sole creator of earth and mankind. Secondly they stand under the authority of spirits and ancestors who are the leaders and instructors of good and evil. The distinct differences between morality and ethics are not acknowledged as they experience it as one with their religion. These assumptions are only written on paper as there is no documentary proof of the history or origin thereof. The growing up and teaching or learning through the elderly and community by word of mouth is their reference in life. Most important is the tribe, community and family rules for belonging and not to be a single individual with his or her own set of rules and regulations. Believing in the spirits and the ancestors justifies certain actions as long as you dont get caught and th erefore has a deterrent effect on your family or community. They also believe that you must keep the spirits happy in order to be blessed and not to be cursed in life. Mostly the interaction between family (grandfathers, grandmothers, fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts, cousins, nieces and nephews) and the community (neighbors, friends, etc.) is a vital link to the forming of the African cultural inheritance (Kunhiyop, 2004:11-28). Secondly, while Western ethics were founded and applied by numerous leaders of the Enlightenment eras, it had different positive as well as negative impacts on society. One example that has a negative impact on the biblical views of the religious community is the privacy factor where a woman has the sole right to apply abortion if she wishes to. Furthermore I do believe that technology is good for anybody except where it is applied have a negative result to humanity (Kunhiyop, 2004:29-46). The reading and understanding of African Chr istian Ethics was very difficult. Samuel makes mention of many authors and in text citing. The English language he used in Chapter three to point out his facts is confusing as to get the history facts straight. What I do understand from this Chapter is that Samuel writes that Christian theology is the backbone of African Christian ethics and that it will be useless if the Scriptures are not part of the guidance to the rules of African Christian ethics. The Black African Christian has a rule of ethics whereby their ancestors are always consulted and is a part and parcel of their decision making. Therefore in their ethics within certain issues they leave out God in certain other issues they consult Him. He explains that African ethics is deeply rooted in the soul and that it becomes personal, influencing the mind, heart, body and spirit of a person. If a family member has got an issue, that issue will affect the immediate family, as well as their distant relatives. It will influence t hose who are living and those who are dead, but still interested in the affairs of the living. To understand the community is to understand African ethics. This is a critical tool and must be used when studying African ethics. These ethics are developed in interaction with the past, the present and the future, nothing or nobody can be excluded. God, the spirits of the departed, the ancestors and good and evil will always have an enormous influence on the morality of the people. Why, because they are African and full of culture. Although the Bible does not support the doctrines of demons, evil spirits and witchcraft, many Christians are unaware of what the Bible teaches on the subject. Christians believe the Bible also serves as an authoritative moral influence, thus in Africa there is no such thing as an ethical system that has no practical and religious implications. There will always be principles or rules that guide behaviour. These principles or rules are intertwined with practi ces of ethics and work nicely together (Kunhiyop, 2004:47-70). Samuel takes into account all the factors that are historically tied to the given topic and describes each problem in detail. In each problem he looks for a Biblical perspective on the issue, usually asking what the Old Testament says and what the New Testament says. This he does by also including the churchs response and the separate African churchs response before drawing an overall final conclusion. This method which he is using is effective because it keeps the Western reader aware of the differences between the West and Africa approach to ethical problems. The Western and traditional African understanding of ethics has affected the ethical thinking of Christians. We need to change our perspective of the church because the church is constantly growing and becoming stronger in other parts of the world. To conclude his thoughts Kunhiyop offers an outline for decision making. He based this outline on five important p rinciples: God is the ultimate model of morality. The Scriptures provide the only authority in matters of morality. Every aspect of life is subject to the laws of the Scriptures. The scriptures must be properly interpreted and the community of faith can provide support, responsibility and accountability. The world provides the boundaries in which we live out this morality and ethics (Kunhiyop, 2004). I really dont see any difference between Western Christian Ethics and African Christian Ethics. Kunhiyops point is actually what is underlying these ethics. Understanding the different world views on Christian ethics paves the way for Western churches to be influenced by and to have a greater influence on the African churches and their day to day functions. It is important for Christianity to overcome the barriers of culture and language. We are after all loved by Christ regardless of ethnicity and the limitations of the human race. I regard it important to note that even though the ethical values between the Western civilization and the African cultures are similar, the traditions within the set framework of each group changes the interpretation and thus also the outcome of the ethical concepts. It is in this idea that the key to unlocking Samuels thinking process lies. He understands, having been exposed to both African and Western culture, that these differences, however subtle some may be, have an immense impact on the eventual interpretation of a persons set of ethical values. Christian ethics cannot be separated from its religious foundation. The important thing is that God requires something of man and that He stands ready to reward the obedience and punish violation. God has something to do with the very meaning of obligation. This book explains these issues well. The Western world is now faced with a choice: are we going to utilize the tools that will enable us to bridge the gap between two very different civilizations or are we going to sit back and d o nothing? With the right understanding of Africans and how they interpret ethical values we can incorporate a set of Christian ethical values that will, without a doubt, benefit both parties (Kunhiyop, 2004). CONCLUSION The churches need to understand and interpret African Christian Ethics for them to survive in their communities. Let us think about this and understand where Kunhiyop comes from. Bibliography Davy T J 2010. HippoBooks African Evangelical Imprint. Online article: https://bibleandmission.wordpress.com/2010/01/19/hippobooks-african-evangelical-imprint/, 15/01/2009. Kunhiyop S W 2004. African Christian Ethics. United States of America: Hippo Books. INTRODUCTION Must Christians become involved in politics? In Romans 13:1-7 God is proclaiming that the government belongs to Him. God also tells us that we must follow the government of the day. Let us now try and establish a link between the church and the state. ASSIGNMENT 3 Evaluate the practical value and effectiveness of the four factors of change in the church and state relations. Political Factor Bishop Desmond Tutu exclaimed, Now I am going back to the church to do the real business of the church and leave politics to those well qualified to do it (Kumalo, 2009). When Nelson Mandela became the new president of South Africa that was then that there was an active democratic development in South Africa. Bishop Buthelezi also made the same statement on his farewell function. If we look at the church leaders we can see that most of these prominent leaders came from the political milieu and then go over to the church. On the other hand the other side of the coin is also true, church leaders sometimes also join departments and commissions. We dont know if what the two theologians above said, made the church to withdraw from politics, but they do make us to think about the church and their leaders in South Africa. The Sociological Factor It is true that Muslim politicians go to the Muslim community for their votes. In the Christian community the Chr istian politicians will go to the Christian community for their votes. The recent call by General Muhammadu Buhari from Nigeria that Muslims should vote only for Muslim candidates in the forthcoming elections in 2003 has generated a lot of controversy. It is important to understand why this is the case. The morality issue of Buhari could be defended from the point of view of his fundamental right. In other words, he has the freedom and fundamental right to take any position on any issue. The changing relationship between religious groups and the state opens up new challenges and new possibilities. More and more people of different religious groups are getting intertwined and use each other to accomplish goals (Kofarmata, 2009). The Economic Factor God has not called Christians just to work in the church, but however he has called us to get involved with all the economical issues in the world. In any case, God is in us and not just in the church. The gifts of the Holy Spirit th at God has bestowed upon us and the calling from God, means getting involved in identifying the causes of poverty. We can address these problems and help the needy with the support of God. This means that it is not only the responsibility of the government, but a responsibility of the church. Christianity also means getting involved in politics so that the people can have a better life. Christians must try to create and provide on the job training for other people also encouraging them to find jobs. The African church specifically must get involved in politics and government. The church needs to educate their people so that everybody can make positive contributions to our country and government (Kunhiyop, 2004:74). The Religious Factor According to McCain (2008) the last two decades of the twentieth century have been known by for great explosion of Christian activity and Christian growth. Kunhiyop (2004:74) said: During the 1970s it was not uncommon to hear Christians, e specially Christian youth, praying for the nation, which was believed to be under the forces of darkness. All night prayer meetings, fasting and prayers for the nation were common in the church and parachurch organisations such as the one mentioned above. I want to say that the above is true, but the opposite is also true and if we as Christians dont wake up, we are going to miss the opportunity to have an influence in politics. People all over the world still think that religion in politics is a negative and harmful issue that needs to be avoided. We really need to change the way people are thinking and acting in our country. We need to have transformation in our religion, having some objective value that can guide us. If we look at our political leaders when they speak, we must be able to say they are right or wrong, not from a political perspective, but from a religious perspective. The scriptures that we use must be not white or black, but the scriptures of the Holy Word of G od. It is the absence of religion in politics that creates this huge gap in our society. We really have to be critical in this analysis. What are we going to do as a nation? Can a nation return to God? I think the question is, can we as a nation rise above our racial and discrimination issues and form one church? If black and white churches unite and stand together, the prayer and fasting for our nation will come back. The youth in this country will stand together and fight for religion and not for politics (MCain, 2008). Distinguish between the concepts state, government, politics and church. State A State is a self-governing political driven place. A state has territory which has internationally recognised boundaries and sometimes there can be quarrels over boundaries. A state has got the following in it: People that are staying and living there permanently. A strong or weak economic structure. A government that must supply things like police services and public services. A state can enter into relations with other states. A state is a nation? Where there is a state there is a nation? Governments can change but a state can stay static and not change for a very long time. Most of the States have sovereignty over their countries so that other states cant interfere. In Somalia this very same thing happened due to civil war. Somalia was part of the internal strife and because it had little authority outside Afghanistan, Somalia collapsed (Global Policy, nd). Government A government can be seen as a body within the community or an organisation that makes and enforce the laws, rules and regulations. A government is committed to the promotion and protection of human rights and human dignity. They are there to establish a society based on democratic values and social justice. The government must lay the foundation for a democratic and open society which is based on the will of people and where every citizen is equally protected by law. They definitely have to improve the quality of life of all the peop le supporting the government of that day. It is necessary to construct a culture of peace and replacing a culture of violence and disregard for human life. For me, this is what a government must consist of (Kunhiyop, 2004:77). Politics Politics is a need for the general public to have a representative in places other than the ordinary home or workplace. Candidates make themselves available to be elected through votes so that they can represent the people in different public and government organisations (Wikipedia, 2010). Church A church is a Christian religious organisation made up of a congregation, its members and clergy. The religious body is organised with constitutions and laws so that the church can function well. Churches often belong to a broader tradition within the Christian religion, like the Dutch Reformed church, sharing in a sense a history, culture and doctrinal rules with other church (Davies, 2009). Renwick and Harman (1958) said the following with re gards to the church: Here we see the fulfillment of our Lords words that, although His kingdom was like a grain of mustard seed, it would yet become a great tree sheltering the birds of the air (Luke 13:19). The small and apparently weak church became a mighty organisation known throughout the earth. Its history shows its moral grandeur; it shows, too, certain defects arising from human weakness and the love of worldly pomp and power contrary to the spirit of the Master. We see many struggles between conflicting systems of church, government, causing strife and division. Contrast the two views, namely: Arguments for Separation versus Arguments for involvement of church and state. William Temple states it succinctly: Either Christians try to act as churchmen in the world, only to find that the world refuses to be ordered on the principles proper to the church; or else they look out for the secular policy most congenial to their Christian outlook, only to find that their Christianity is a dispensable adjunct of no practical importance (Kunhiyop, 2004:86). Arguments for Separation can be because of the following reasons: People must not get involved in politics, people are there to proclaim the Word of God and evangelize. The state might harm the church in a big way. The church might be influenced or pressured to make decisions that can be very harmful. The state can demand that the ban on homosexual activity or abortion must be taken away and that the church have to acknowledge and regard these activities as right. We can see that politics is sometimes dirty and morals and values are thrown overboard for the sake of politics. Christians have ce rtain values and must adhere to that value system. In South Africa many politicians are also clergy of the church. The problem with this is that when the clergy makes mistakes in government, it reflects not only bad in the church, but also in the community. People then often say, Look at that man, he is a Bishop and a man of the church, but he steals from society (Kunhiyop, 2004:86-88). Arguments for involvement of church and state can be because of the following reasons: Some people say that the state should be part of religion generally to operate properly and encourage ethical and moral believes inside and outside of government. Religious groups ought to be involved in politics, to assure that laws are passed which reflect the truth of religion. People from different walks of life have become highly and vocally involved in promoting what they believe to be Christian values in government and this is a good thing. There is that perception that all politicians are dirty, we ll that is not true. When Christians becomes involved in state affairs, there is so much to do: Praying, assisting others to be loyal to the state, changing moral and ethical values in our country and many other good deeds. I think sometimes we can learn from the Islam people. The Islamic religious people hold that political life can only function properly within the context of Islamic law. Since Gods law is the truth to all people, any state law opposed to Gods law would be harmful to the citizens and displeasing to God. What an awesome concept, follow the law of the state and you are following the law of God. Christians need to be realistic about the prospects ahead for the church and the state, with all the difficulties being faced in an honest manner. On the other hand, there are many encouragements. The rapid growth of Christianity helps the churches to put more pressure on the state to change and become one force concept. Ultimately, however, the future of the church and the s tate depends upon God and not us (Kunhiyop, 2004:89-95). CONCLUSION Separating religion and politics is so wrong because God is the one who chooses our rulers. If we are the ones not actively involved in electing those godly men and women, then were going to have a nation of secular laws. Thats not what our founding fathers intended and thats certainly isnt what God intended. Bibliography Kumalo S R 2009. Christians in Politics Portal. Online article: https://www.christianpoliticsportal.org/k/n22654/news/view/364654/383320/The-people-shall-govern-now-they-have-only-the-possibility-to-vote.html, 15/01/2009. Kofarmata A I 2009. Nigeria: Re-Saving Buhari. Online article: https://allafrica.com/stories/200911180160.html, 16/01/2009. Kunhiyop S W 2004. African Christian Ethics. United States of America: Hippo Books. McCain D 2008. The Church in Africa in the Twenty-First Century: Characteristics, Challenges and Opportunities. Online article: https://www.iics.com/church_in_africa.html, 16/01/2009. Global Policy n.d. What is a State? Online article: https://www.globalpolicy.org/nations-a-states/what-is-a-state.html, 16/01/2009. Wikipedia 2010. Politics. Online article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics, 17/01/2009. Davies S 2009. What is a Church? Online article: https://protestantism.suite101.com/article.cfm/what_is_a_church, 17/01/2009. Renwick A M and Harman A M (eds) 1958. The Story of the Church. Leicester, England: Inter-Varsity Press. INTRODUCTION What is a strike? Are strikes permissible and what are God and the Bible saying about strikes? ASSIGNMENT 4 Briefly define what a strike is and describe the nature of a general strike. Davidmann (1996) made the following comment: People are enslaved when they are forced to work through need, have to work to survive. They are enslaved to the extent to which they are forced to accept mere survival existence in return for the work they do. They are free to the extent to which they are able to choose freely between one employer and another, to the extent to which they are backed by a comprehensive system of social security and services if falling on difficult times. I think we must first try to understand why people strike. Sometimes people are powerless to fight for his or her wages and because of this they get together and form a group to demand better wages. A general strike is when people belonging to an organisation dont want to work anymore and they just refuse to work or cause other people to not perform work. The nature of a general strike may be specific to a particular workplace, employer or unit within a workplace. Strikes are always used to put pres sure governments to change policies. Occasionally, strikes are organised to change the rules of a particular political party. Strikes are usually used to show the employee that they can fight the system and the employer for a better future. Most of the strikes are undertaken by labour unions during collective bargaining to assist the employees in their fight to obtain more wages or working conditions (Lenin, 1899). State and assess the advantages and disadvantages of general strikes. The advantages of a general strike. The advantages of a general strike are that employees can really be properly presented by unions fighting for their rights on national level. It is a fact that every person must work to survive and not all people are strong enough to fight for their rights. Employees must sometimes work under very difficult conditions, for example the mineworkers work for hours on end underground. Strikes can be important for implementing new working practices which improve productivity. A general strike can be a necessary stage in the struggle, the necessary means for getting the old leadership fired and new leadership appointed so that within the working class itself, better leadership can take place and employees can know that their well being is taken care off. A general strike can either result in victory or defeat, but the responsibility lies with the unions (Trotsky, 1947). The disadvantages of a general strike. Usually with a general strike there is a mass group of people that struggle for victory and some of the people get lost in this whole process. Some might during this struggle try to get out, but because he or she is one of thousands then cannot get out and gets in trouble with the rest of the group. Yes, it is normal that unions will not worry about the one individual and will only fight for the issue of the majority. This is why individual agreements between employees and management are then not allowed. The union leaders, for instance (SANDU) make decisions for all employees, which most of the time is not positive for the individual person that may have other issues that needs to be tabled. Most collective bargaining agreements require all employees to support their union financially as a condition of their continued employment. Does the employee then really get his money worth? The law provides that employees may decide not to formally join the union. In South Africa, they are also then not required to pay certain fees. Another disadvantage of union membership is that members can be fined or otherwise disciplined by their union for engaging in activities without their permission. So, what we can say is that the union is in actual fact controlling the lives of these poor uninformed people (Hunter, 1999). I would like to give the following example: During the SA Defence Forces strike many soldiers were injured and lost their jobs because of the strike. The Defence Force needs to be a disciplined force and cannot afford the scandal of soldiers striking. The problem with strikes is that people may lose their lives and get fired fighting for the wrong issues. Is it really worthwhile to strike? Briefly describe a real-life scenario involving a strike. Analyse the situation, applying appropriate Christian principles and sound reasoning to all the parties involved in the situation. In August 2009 SANDF soldiers went on an illegal protest in Pretoria at the Union buildings. The soldiers were co mplaining about their salaries and the fact that they must protect the country, inside and outside the borders of South Africa. Some of the concerns that they raised was for example: A soldier who is 46 years of age is earning a salary of R5000 before his deductions, while his college in the Police Service is earning much more. You cannot take care of your family or even try to buy a house for that amount. The soldiers are staying in backyard hired rooms with their families. Some soldiers stay in the mess because of cheaper accommodation, but his or her family is at home in another province. The other issue that they raised was about their working conditions, the fact that most of the working facilities in the Defence Force are old and dilapidated. The equipment used to do their daily tasks is also not up to standard. Everyday some of the soldiers put their lives at risk working in unfavourable conditions (Mail Guardian, 2009:1-4). When we look at the scenario above, we can see that the soldiers really had something to complain about. The fact that for so many years nobody took the time to listen to the soldiers, made them to react in this undisciplined and unprofessional manner. The soldiers are sometimes pushed for productivity and not safety. If we look at the hours the soldiers must work, the fact that they deploy to foreign countries, dying is not worth it. I just think the manner in which they strike is not very good for the honour of the Defence Force. We belong to the government and everything we do reflects both negative and positive in government. I also think that the soldier must ask him or herself the following question: Who are they working for, is it for themselves or for God? We must work for the Glory of God and not because it feels like a death sentence. The Bible is not condemning us, in actual fact the Bible is showing us all Gods blessing for us. By reading the early chapters of Genesis we can receive teachings regarding a biblical vie w of work. A Christians work is a natural, inevitable development out of Gods work. God, who works, created us also to work, like Adam and Eve in the garden were instructed by God to gather food, cultivate the earth, name the animals and care for creation. The fall doesnt change this instruction, but it does add to our role as co-workers. We now assist God in His redeeming work, restoring creation to Gods original intentions. Titus 2:9-10, Exhort bondservants to be obedient to their own masters, to be well pleasing in all things, not answering back, not pilfering, but showing all good fidelity, that they may adorn the doctrine of God our Saviour in all things. Work came before the fall and it is not a result of the fall. The fall has made the context in which we work more challenging. Working with God has great significance, value and is much more than paid employment. What a wonderful opportunity for a father to show his appreciation to God by painting the house or a mother g etting lunches ready for the children and assisting at a welfare organisation. Whatever you do, how big or small, all of this is work for the Kingdom of God. This means that those of us who are unemployed can still work; those of us who are not getting paid can still work. Much of our time outside of paid employment is work. Most people want to make a difference with their lives, but first we have to identify our part in extending the Kingdom of God. We are agents for good and living in this world. The workplace is where most Christians spend the whole day and work is a divine calling, especially for the soldier. CONCLUSION Striking is not always the answer for our problems. God is the answer too our problems. Bibliography Davidmann M 1996. The Right to Strike. Online article: https://www.solhaam.org/articles/right.html#top, 21/05/2010. Lenin V I 1899. On Strikes. Online article: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1899/dec/strikes.htm, 21/05/2010. Trotsky L 1947. The Nature of the General Strike. Online article: https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/ni/vol13/no08/trotsky.htm, 17/01/2009. Hunter R P 1999. Disadvantages of Union Representation. Online article: https://www.mackinac.org/2313, 17/01/2009. MailGuardian 2009. Sisulu: Protesting soldiers will be sacked. Online article: https://www.mg.co.za/article/2009-08-27-sisulu-protesting-soldiers-will-be-sacked#comments, 21/05/2010. INTRODUCTION The objective of Africa must be to alleviate poverty and to improve the quality of life of people. Developing countries need to come together and implement strategies to get rid of poverty. We can always just treat the symptoms, but we must get to the cause of poverty. We need to focus on certain areas to address the needs of the poor. ASSIGNMENT 5 Identify and discuss the causes of poverty. Pension for the elderly. The value of the South African social pension is relatively low, but generous if we look at other developing countries. South Africa just doesnt have adequate welfare assistance for South Africans and there is no support for the unemployed in this country. Studies have shown that with households headed by older persons, because of the impact of HIV and AIDS, this has even worsened. This old-age pension then serves as the lifeline for most of the older South Africans. People are abusing the older people physically and economically in order to get to their pension money. The funds of the elderly for food, water, electricity are limited and will have an impact on them, the poorer they are, the larger the impact. HIV and AIDS. This is a pandemic in South Africa and has got a tremendous influence in the mortality of young adults. As a result of HIV and AIDS, the older and poorer people not only have to care for their adult children who suffer from AIDS, but a lso for their grandchildren who are orphaned when their parents die. The grandmothers and grandfathers are emotionally drained as a result of the changing family structure and through the loss of their children, who traditionally would have cared for them in their old age (Kunhiyop, 2004:132). Unemployment. In South Africas townships where large proportions of poor people live, the informal sector makes an enormous negative contribution to the local economy. Since 1995, large numbers of workers have lost their jobs in the formal sector and the informal sector has consequently grown, placing a huge burden on the government. Education. It has been found that there are many children being underachievers because of the fact that they come from low-income families. This often begins in their early years as children where the child must go to a primary school that is not on standard, or he or she cant even go to a school. Families and society who can only invest a small portion of t heir money in the education and development of their children end up with less favourable results for their children. Poverty often drastically affects childrens success in school. Poor children have a great deal less healthcare and this ultimately results in many absences from the academic year. The children get so sick that they are unable to attend school and write exams (Bradshaw and Steyn, 2001:20). Over population. Overpopulation and lack of access to birth control methods drive poverty. There is just not enough space for all the people in this world of us. Everyday more and more children are born and families just dont have the capacity to feed the children or to even care for them (Kunhiyop, 2004:131). If we look at the unemployment figures, we can see that there are not enough jobs for everyone. We can truly and honestly say that the middle class income group is not anymore the middle class income group; they are now the lower class income group. The worlds population is expected to reach nearly 9 billion in 2040. Poverty causes overpopulation as it gives women little power to plan childhood, have educational attainment, or a career. Women are left at their own mercy, suffering because there are not in a position to provide for their families if something happens to the spouse (Wikipedia, 2010). Explain the root causes of poverty according to Biblical theism. Biblical Theism can be explained in the following way: Because God exist, reality is personal. Biblical Theism says that life is full of resources and wealth. Humans are just imagining that they are poor and that they have nothing, for instance wealth. Man must be creative in his thinking. Theism also says that wealth is in the mind and heart of people. Poverty can be solved by creating societies that can create new hope for themselves and their community, like solar energy (Millers and Myers, 2007). Miller and Myers (2007) told the following story: For example, an old man worked as a scavenger among the citys dumps and lived in little cardboard shack by a river in a slum in Indonesia. After a developers bulldozer came without any warning and bulldozed his cardboard shack by the riverside into the river, in tears he said, Even the rubbish have a place, but I have no place. The next day, he was found dead curled up by the riverside. When the poor have no understanding why t hey exist or why they were even created in the first place, when they see that even the rubbish have more value than they do, when they cannot believe that they are capable of effecting any change in their lives, what would bringing the Gospel to him be? (Miller and Myers, 2007). Is it possible for us to help the poor so that they can regain their faith and trust in this world and in God? The poor are also made in the image of God and they need to know that. God not only created the world and all of us for nothing, we are here to serve and to work for the Kingdom on God. There need to be change in us, change in people and in the communities as a whole. The poor need to feel that we love them and want to take care of them. We need to love the poor in such a way that it will restore in them their own image of themselves and the understanding that they are precious and valuable to God. God gave the poor gifts and He wants to empower them so that their lives can change for the good a nd that they can be worthwhile to their communities (Miller and Myers, 2007). Create a body of advice that is practically orientated to assist the poor and needy. Give as much as you can. Giving is a key to living well. The bigger picture is: The whole earth belongs to God, His glory fills the earth, and Jesus Christ is the centre of the Universe and everything that belongs to you. All things are yours to enjoy, but also to manage. We are all managers that have a responsibility to give and to share. Its an attitude, a lifestyle and a habit. God rewards those who give to the needy. We must be mindful of the ways we advance financially in life. There are two kinds of seed seed to eat and seed to sow. Do not eat the seed that should be used to sow next season! If you do, you will have absolutely nothing when harvest-time comes, for you did not sow anything. Jesus Christ has said it is more blessed to give than to receive. What can we give? Many of you are very busy and are unable to spend the time necessary to care for the poor, even if you want to. Well, luckily charity depends on industry and while you may not currently have time, you might be able to supply money for those who have time but not money. What do you have? Knowledge, skills, love, experience. Share what you have. Also share money. God knows how much you have and keep, and spend, and use and give. Ephesians 5:2 Live a life filled with love for others, following the example of Christ, who loved you and gave Himself as a sacrifice to take away your sins. Having Compassion. Compassion can be divided into three categories: (1) Social Services. (2) Programs to educate the poor. (3) Empower the poor (Coleman and John, 1999:8). Getting involved with Social Services. There is a lot that we can do to help the poor. Soup kitchens are a wonderful method in feeding the poor. An outreach to certain hospices and institutions to visit the poor and dying people. Becoming involved in community outreach to assist the people that are struggling with crime, drugs and the delivery of basic needs. We must always have direct contact with Social Services as a chur ch to show our compassion and love to the poor people (Coleman and John, 1999:9). Programs to educate the poor. We must ask ourselves what causes this poverty in our country. Well, unemployment I think is the biggest problem in South Africa. People are dying of hunger because they are not educated enough and do not have a job. It is our responsibility to teach the people and give them certain skills in life (Coleman and John, 1999:9-10). Empowerment of the poor. The purpose of this is to enable the poor to become better people so that they can actively participate in life. The church must empower the poor with faith so that they can believe in themselves again. Usually poor people dont have a good self esteem and they see themselves as worthless and nobodies. Let us empower them so that they can gain the confidence in life to rise above the circumstances (Coleman and John, 1999:10-11). Building Relationships (Jesus and the Disciples) Are there ways that you can combine a ny of your normal activities with caring for the poor? For example, could you include the time you spend with your spouse or child or discipleship relationship in helping others together? It may be an encounter with a homeless person on the street who needs money immediately for his children at home; it may be someone who is being evicted from his apartment the next day. All the above circumstances can make us uneasy in helping because it requires urgency and, often, fast cash. It is your responsibility to take time to understand the situation and what will be the best way to help (Kunhiyop, 2004:147). Samuel Waje Kunhiyop says the following: First, Christians are fundamentally different from non-Christians. Second, Christians must permeate non-Christian Society. Third, Christians can influence non-Christian society. Fourth, Christians must retain their Christian distinctions (Kunhiyop, 2004:145). Society today is riddled with a lot of challenges, one of which is corruption and criminality. Everyday we hear in the news about the crime and corruption that occurs in our country. Corrupt Christians are stealing from the poor, not worrying about the poor. Accountability and responsibility towards the poor always go together. Responsibility has to do with who is to blame. Sometimes we as Christians want to climb the ladder of success, but we dont realise that the impact is greater on those around us. Let us first think about the poor and the poverty stricken people. Let us try and defend the poor against ourselves, society and government (Kunhiyop, 2004:146). CONCLUSION The moral of the story is that each one of us can make a difference even in the smallest way that we are able to contribute. It is better to light one candle than to curse the darkness. Bibliography Kunhiyop S W 2004. African Christian Ethics. United States of America: Hippo Books. Bradshaw D and Steyn K (eds) 2001. Poverty and Chronic Diseases in South Africa. Online article: https://www.mrc.ac.za/bod/povertyfinal.pdf, 17/01/2009. Wikipedia 2010. Poverty. Online article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty, 17/01/2009. Miller D and Myers B (eds) 2007. Understanding Poverty Helping the Poor. Online article: 17/01/2009. Coleman S J and John A (eds) 1999. Compassion, Solidarity and Empowerment, Social Thought, 19: 2, 7 à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬  20. Online journal: https://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J131v19n02_02, 20 May 2010. INTRODUCTION The church is constantly now confronted with new reproductive technologies. The church must also acknowledge the Word of God in everything that is done. In all of this the church must submit to the will of God. How must the church react towards technologies and reproductive advancements? ASSIGNMENT 6 Clarify the benefits of reproductive technologies and how these impact the continent of Africa. If you live outside of Africa, shed light on the impact reproductive technologies are having on your continent. It is indeed praiseworthy to see that the medical industry found ways to overcome infertility. Infertility causes daily great pain and anguish for many married couples. We all know that children are a wonderful gift of marriage and it is good to try to overcome the obstacles that prevent children from being conceived and born. Reproductive technologies are so advanced and can enable infertile people to achieve pregnancy. Geisler (1989:186-190) looked at numerous ways for reproductive technologies. There are two forms of Artificial insemination: artificial insemination by the husband (AIH) and artificial insemination by a donor (AID). In vitro fertilization (IVF), Surrogate motherhood, Cloning and many other. God said to Moses, Who makes him deaf or mute? Who gives him sight or makes him blind? Is it not I the Lord (Exodus 4:11). We can see that reproductive technology is an excellent mechanism used to help stimulate the growth of the population, but there is also a negativ e impact on the world as well. The world has become too small for all the people because they have exploited its resources in an unsustainable manner. Who has been doing the exploiting and who consumes more than they must? Well, it is Africa, the continent with one of the biggest population. Africa, with an average fertility rate of more than five children per woman has grown the fastest among regions. I also think when people talk about overpopulation, they must point fingers at us, because there are so many poor people in Africa. I think that because of Reproductive Technologies the world is now going towards mass famine and deprivation. Such growth cannot continue otherwise within a few hundred years every square foot of the Earths surface would be taken up by human beings. It is time for Africa to wake up and admit that the over population is on our side. If we cut down our population to half, then there might be enough resources to go around. It is very natural to ask the quest ions, does humanity have a carrying capacity and, if so, what is it and when will we reach or overshoot this limit? However, time is needed for the birth and death rates to equilibrate, during which time the population will continue to grow rapidly. Whether human beings understand these things or not, the Bible promises that: The glory of the Lord will be revealed and all mankind together will see it. For the mouth of the Lord has spoken (Isaiah 40:5). Discuss how you believe the church should respond with regard to new scientific knowledge. We should never turn the chance down to find cures for Cancer or Alzheimers disease in favour of a belief. Personally I think the problem is with our own inability as a society to know what to do with discoveries of science. Most of us have no problem to know what to do with discoveries of science and without the discoveries of science, life would be much less comfortable. Reproductive technologies and other technologies have made a huge difference in some peoples lives. Medical technologies can prolong lives and give comfort in times of pain and suffering. Krattenmaker (2010) said the following: Do religious believers really want the truth of their faith wagered on an attempt to prove that countless scientists have somehow botched their reading of the fossil record? No, because the Bible is our ultimate authority. We ought to be able to trust our God and the claims the Bible makes. Suggestion to creationists: Let science be science and let religion prevail in the vast areas where science has little or nothing to offer. I dont think that religion must be worried about the facts of science, because religion will always be proof of God and it is what the Bible tells us. When we start to argue on which one is correct, the beliefs of the Bible and the book of Genesis is a good starting point. Science and the Bible are light years apart. Being a Christian in modern science can be very frustrating to some people. Some of the people will find themselves thinking why he cant make a choice between the two. We as Christians must not get involved in Reproductive Technologies (Kunhiyop, 2004:236). Scientists can be scientists and also Christians. They can keep their scientific book next to their bibles. I really believe that the church can discern with the help of God if some reproductive technologies is right or wrong. The church can always intervene with values, moral and ethics when they see technologies being used that is dangerous to society. The church can always go back to the bible when they need to research about technology. They say that reproductive technologies can sometimes be for the better than for the worse, like giving a person without a leg, prosthesis. I think we just have to follow the example of Paul: Whatever you do, do your work heartily, as for the Lord rather than for men. Let us as human not play God. Humans can go far in trying to better the medicine and technologies, but there are limits, limits that only God can overcome (Kunhiyop, 2004:239). CONCLUSION Humankind supports the quest for knowledge in order to better human life. Bibliography Geisler N L 1989. Christian Ethics: Options and Issues. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Book House. Krattenmaker T 2010. The Bible versus Science. Online article: https://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2007/02/the_bible_vs_sc.html, 17/01/2009. Kunhiyop S W 2004. African Christian Ethics. United States of America: Hippo Books.